|
Hospitals are an important part of Finnish national
heritage. As public buildings they represent the development of
Finland from a Swedish province to the Great Duchy of Russia and
finally to an independent country. The hospitals, designed by famous
architects, are monuments of architecture but they also reflect
the history of medicine.
The types of hospital buildings have transformed
in many ways during the history of hospital architecture. In the
1900s the pattern changed from pavilions to skyscrapers. This was
made possible by the 19th century scientific advances, breakthroughs
to understanding the causes of disease. However, they were not fully
understood in their time and so they were translated into changes
in hospital design in the 20th century. Pavilion hospitals were
replaced by multi-storey block hospitals in which wards and services
were concentrated together. This new type was created in the United
States. In Europe the hospitals were not necessarily as high as
in the United States. Nevertheless, they aimed at the idea of concentration.
In Finland the end point of this development was the Helsinki University
Central Hospital. This 15-storey hospital was built in 1956-1965,
and designed by architects Reino Koivula and Jaakko Paatela.
This new block-type system was also made possible
by architectural progress. Metal was increasingly being used for
the building framework, and the steel skeleton building was introduced
in about 1900. This made it possible to build to a greater height.
The tendency was toward skyscrapers. Also, Functionalism demanded
concrete structure. In Finland the new building types for health
and sports became the most important monuments of functionalist
building. Alvar Aalto's Paimio Sanatorium (1933) is one of the most
renowned examples, even internationally acknowledged. At Paimio,
the load-bearing structure was a concrete pillar frame, with the
exception of the open-air wards, which formed the largest monolithic
concrete structure in Finland at the time. The functionalist demand
for light, air and sun corresponded to contemporary ideas in medicine,
particularly in the treatment of tuberculosis. On the basis of rational
and hygienic demands Aalto designed an organised building that can
be seen as a "healing machine".
Although the major changes in the 20th century
hospitals occurred because of the scientific progress, it can be
argued that some of the changes within hospitals were due to other
reasons. The hospitals of the last two centuries can also be seen
as monuments of the transfer of power from the layman to the professional.
Teaching and research have become a more and more important part
of the modern hospital. Sometimes this has led to the fact that
the patient is only seen as an example of his or her disease. Furthermore,
medicine has become a specialized branch of science. Therefore,
co-operation between specialists has become imperative, which makes
it necessary for them all to be within easy reach of one another.
Moreover, there was a wish for specialist hospitals to be built
near each other. The Meilahti University Hospital area in Helsinki
is a case in point. In this area special hospitals have been built
close to each other during the last one hundred years. The Women's
Clinic (1934) in Helsinki was the first hospital in this area and
it was also the first hospital in Finland, where the maternity hospital
and gynaecological ward were housed in the same building. Soon after
this, the Children´s Clinic (1946) and the Children´s
Castle (1948), an institution for the specialized care of children
and a training school for children's nurses, were built close to
the Women's Clinic in Meilahti hospital area.
In the end, when speaking about the conservation
and architecture of modern hospitals we are discussing a serious
subject. The modern Finnish hospitals mentioned above are still
in operation and new technology sets challenges to them. Therefore
there are certain risks of too massive redevelopment. Plain modern
architecture is known to be very sensitive to alteration. When original
details are changed too drastically, the architectural value of
building can disappear and we lose architectural monuments as well
as a part of the history of public health.
Sources: Birch-Lindgren, Gustaf, 1934. Svenska
lasarettsbyggnader. Modern lasarettsbyggnadskonst i teori och praktik.
Stock-holm; Birch-Lindgren, Gustaf, 1951. Modern hospital planning
in Sweden and other countries. Stockholm; Forty, Adrian, 1984. "The
modern hospital in England and France: the social and medical uses
of architecture", Building and Society. Ed. Anthony D. King.
Lon-don; Foucault, Michel, 1993 (1963). The Birth of the Clinic.
An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London. Naissance dela Clinique.
Paris 1963; Nikula, Riitta, 2000. "The Inter-War Period: the
Architecture of the Young Republic", 20th-century architecture
Finland; Pevsner, Nikolaus, 1979. A History of building types. London;
Thomson, John D. - Goldin, Grace, 1975. The hospital: a social and
architectural history. New Haven & London.
|