|
History:
The Herbert Hospital is an exemplar scheme for Florence Nightingales'
ideas on pavilion hospitals that she explained in 'Notes on Hospitals'
that was published in 1863. The sanitarian reformers were convinced
of the need to better ventilate the hospital buildings to improve
health outcomes and Nightingale set out the requirements for the
optimum hospital plan. These were supported by other theories from
medical doctors such as Aitken and Pringle. The pavilion plan was
very influential in the 19th century because of the publicity and
the size and scale of the commissions that adopted these ideas.
The Herbert Hospital closed during the 1980s and has now been converted
into private residential accommodation.
Architecture:
Designed bin 1861-5 by Captain Douglas Galton RE, the Herbert Hospital
plan consisted of four double and three single pavilions. It differs
from the French Laboisire / Bordeaux format in that the spine is
a wide cross ventilated communication corridor and not an arcaded
court with pavilions on one or both sides. In the French examples
the main entrance is on the centreline at one end of the court with
significant ancillary buildings at the far end. For the English
version, the preference is to put the entrance at the cross axis
on the centre point of the corridor spine, and here the admin buildings,
kitchen, dining, chapel are grouped with formal entrance through
the front admin building.
However, the essential overlaps between the pavilion plans in both
France and England relates to the ward plan. It is essentially based
on a series of dormitory blocks linked to a circulation spine. The
dormitories house the beds in an open plan ward with sanitary accommodation
at one end and nurses accommodation at the other. Treatments and
administrative tasks were located in the centre of the dormitory.
One of the reasons for the success of the plan was that it was easily
adapted to different circumstances, could be developed in different
architectural styles and that it was in the spirit of the interest
in public health reform.
|